Store Audit & Compliance Software Ghana

Two form templates run on one platform. A supermarket or minimart aisle is measured on planogram adherence, facings and share of shelf. A provision shop, kiosk or market stall is measured on whether the must-stock list is present, whether the frontage is still visible from the street, whether the POSM survived, and whether the marked price matches the agreed GHS price. Scores roll up separately so neither channel is judged by the other's rules.

Any scored parameter can be set to refuse submission without a picture. Each picture carries its GPS position, its timestamp and the outlet code, so a wide frontage shot and a close shelf shot stay attached to the visit that produced them and can be reopened months later.

The failure leaves the report and becomes a corrective task. The task names the outlet, the parameter and the owner, carries the audit photo as context, and stays open until a later visit captures fresh evidence that the fix held.

Yes. Administrators build the question set, the answer types, the weightings and the photo rules in the portal, then publish a version to a channel, a region or a single beat. Visits already submitted keep the version they were scored under.

Every answer resolves to a pass or a fail, every parameter carries a weight, and the weighted result rolls up into one percentage for the outlet. Weightings are set per channel, so a missing planogram section costs a supermarket more than it costs a table-top seller.

Yes. Forms, photos and scores are written to the device first, so an auditor working a beat in Savannah, the Upper regions or on a rural agro route keeps submitting. The queue uploads itself once coverage returns.

The agreed shelf price for that SKU and that channel, held in GHS. The auditor records what is actually marked or asked for at the outlet, and any gap is reported as a price adherence exception instead of sitting in a field note nobody reads.

A sample of completed visits is reassigned for a blind re-check by a second auditor, and anything the two disagree on goes to a supervisor with both sets of photos in one view. That is what keeps a score meaningful when the person scoring is also the person being measured.